Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for August, 2010

The federal government is throwing $3.5B at low performing schools in order for them to implement reform models most professional educators haven’t ever even heard of:

More than a third of school districts reported they had no familiarity with the models that are part of the federal School Improvement Grants heading to school districts this fall in a bid by the Obama administration to change the fortunes of the bottom five percent of America’s schools, according to the report from the Washington-based Center on Education Policy. And fewer than 12 percent had implemented any of the models in their schools.(http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/District_Dossier/2010/08/limited_familiarity_succes_wit.html#comments)

What a sad and massive disconnect between schools and the federal government.   Sometimes it is so nice to know we have a federal government that knows so much about turning schools around.  This way our nation’s professional educators don’t even have to know what to do.  They just need to take the money and follow the directions on the package it came in.  (yes, that is sarcasm)

Read Full Post »

Jefferson Elementary School in the St. Louis Public School system has offered cash to parents who send their children to their school.  There are conditions for attendance.  Read about it here and participate in the poll below.

Read Full Post »

As I posted a few weeks ago, Larry Cuban’s new book, “As Good As It Gets: What School Reform Brought to Austin”, conveys a very direct message about the realities of large urban school districts as he sees them.  Specifically, in Chapter 3- Reinventing the High School 2005-2008, Cuban explains his viewpoint on how schools have become accountable for a student’s academic failure, rather than the children and their families.  In this excerpt, Cuban does not soften his rhetoric toward ‘policy elites’ or the ambitions of NCLB :

Whereas policy elites and educators formally said that students and families were to blame for poor performance, reform rhetoric has shifted: today policy elites and educators say that the school or district is at fault. This fundamental change in perspective on the causes of inequities and outcomes is captured in the words of national leaders, who often repeat the phrase “all children can learn” admonished teachers and administrators to avoid in the “soft bigotry of low expectations.”   This reversal of responsibility for inequitable outcomes has shifted the burden for academic success almost completely from students’ shoulders to those of their teachers, principals, and superintendents. It is as if professionals could take any student and make him or her a success regardless of background.

While most of us cherish egalitarian beliefs — enshrined in the NCLB goal that all students will test proficient by 2014 — research studies and the facts of daily experience should give us pause before we nod in agreement. This total equality in results may perhaps occur in heaven, but will never materialize on earth, where variability in families’ behaviors and students’ talents, motivation, interest, and skills remains a stubborn fact.

Thus, within a few decades, we’ve seen a 180-degree shift in responsibility for chronic academic failure. Neither extreme, however, squares with the facts. Responsibility rests with both community and district, both school and family, both teachers and students.

In this excerpt, Cuban minces no words.  He more or less mocks the ambitions of No Child Left Behind. This book is wrought with criticism of top-down policies and how they affect the behaviors of school boards, district administrators, school administrators, teachers, and students and families.

Read Full Post »

Two weeks ago while I was browsing the Education section of Barnes and Noble looking for activity books with my 5 and 7 year old daughters, I stumbled across a very new book by Larry Cuban called, “As Good As It Gets: What School Reform Brought to Austin.”  There was a single copy sitting randomly amongst a hodge podge of math facts, abc’s 123s, make a rocket out of a 2-liter bottle books for kids. 

I pounced on it then spent the next few days harmonizing with the content as my head bobbed and highlighter sprang to action in agreement and familiarity of the observations Cuban presents.  I am very familiar with large, urban school districts in Texas as I’ve spent much time over the past decades visiting with them and working on districtwide systems for Special Education.

Over the next few weeks, because there is so much great content in this book, I’m going to make several posts that highlight different quotes from Cuban’s writing and my own related commentary.   To start, here is a gem of a quote from Chapter 2, page 82, of Larry Cuban’s “As Good As It Gets: What School Reform Brought to Austin”:

Readers need no reminder that urban school systems like AISD [Austin Independent School District] are large bureaucratic organizations whose leaders, through coercion, incentives, and persuasion, try to steer hundreds of administrators and thousands of teachers toward improved practices aimed at achieving district goals.  Yet as independent and powerful as these boards and superintendents seem to groups in the community, they are totally dependent upon the political and financial support of parents, community leaders, and state officials.  When organized groups of citizens demand changes in policy, school boards and superintendents often respond…  Or when the state alters its funding formulas to give low-wealth districts more money, wealthier districts suffer from leaner budgets and reduced programs (as when AISD cut art and music teachers in 2003).

Moreover, economic recessions, demographic changes, and unexpected events (the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001; hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005) can shatter the shell of control and rational action that district leaders project to the community… District leaders, then, while appearing as rational actors in charge of organizations governed by rules and bureaucrats, often act in political and nonrational ways.

I highlight this quote because I have encountered how disrupting uncontrollable events can be on a school district and how great leaders can get derailed from their worthwhile agendas.  During the decade of reform in AISD that this book studies, I personally witnessed the struggles of large, urban school districts in Texas.  In a single 10 year period, these school districts faced the abnormally complex issues that have come with such disruptions as the ‘dot com’ bubble burst, 9-11, two hurricanes that displaced thousands of students into the urban school districts in Texas, Texas school finance reform and the court rulings on the ‘Robinhood’ laws, a huge increase in English-language learners, the complete restructuring and deployment of accountability systems due to state legislation and No Child Left Behind, and, most recently, an economic downturn affecting school budgets in virtually every corner of the nation.  These are all extreme forces that affected, and still affect, political and functional stability within these school districts. I am sure I am overlooking other events of equal effect.

In a few words, I don’t envy the leaders of our large, urban school districts and Cuban’s writings may explain to us all why their jobs are so difficult.  I will continue to highlight excerpts to learn from and I hope my posts encourage someone to read the book.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 161 other followers

%d bloggers like this: